Print Article
BookMark Article
10 newest articles RSS
Stop The Games, Says US Chief Justice
Author : John Chambers
Submitted : 2010-10-22 07:55:00 Word Count : 548 Popularity: 7
Tags: Law, legal, lawyers, claim, personal injury, Tac, compensation lawyers, work cover
The Chief Justice admonished about thirty judges and lawyers who are involved in worker's compensation criminal cases. The lawyers have to stop using the court as a means to play with individual and public rights. This chief justice assembled these lawyers and judges to his courtroom in order to address these highly unorthodox methods of using delaying tactics and panic in order to sway public opinion to their side and told them that it was no longer tolerated.
He didn't blame any one in particular. Because of the attorney general's complaint that judges were making it hard to look into and then prosecute worker's compensation cases, the judge made his ruling. Several lawyers commented on the attorney general's statements, which were made out of court.
The conference goal, according to the chief justice, is to ensure the speedy application of justice. Mistakes made during implementation should also be avoided.
The judges and lawyers were told to bring the worker's compensation cases to the front of their calenders. Court were told to move the cases up on the dockets, and authorized to use special jury terms to get the cases tried.
One lawyer, at the conference, suggested the order was void because it lacked three of the five justices' signatures. The order, which also set a gag rule in order, had the signature of only one chief justice. Statements made publicly out of court, including criticisms and recriminations, made for the specific purpose of swaying public opinion is not helpful to obtaining justice.
The justice reminded the judges and attorneys that they had all pledged to avoid taking offense at each others' personalities. The lawyers were reminded that issues with other lawyers needed to be dealt with in the proper arena.
That means lawyers could bring up problems with other lawyers in the court itself, with grievance committees or in the legal practice commission. The judges were then reminded that while due process must be allowed, the constitution gives the right to a speedy trial.
Though he did allow questions, the justice ensured everyone knew that complaints or excuses about past actions were not to be made. Those issues would be addressed in the correct arena.
A clear distinction was illustrated between media reporting and prosecution comments by one attorney whose client had been indicted by a grand jury. While our constitution's first amendment allows for freedom of reporting, the Canon of Ethics makes it clearly unethical, according to the lawyer. Another lawyer, whose client used to administrate a workers compensation division, said he had not violated the gag order, but rather had taken legal steps to protect his client.
The attorney representing an indicted lawyer said he wouldn't give up any of his client's rights just to be rude. One lawyer talked briefly about his concern that by not speaking, the public may think his client is admitting to some guilt.
The intensifying rate of publicity given these cases was the concern of another attorney. Also, someone else stated that the publicity in and of itself was their major problem, as they couldn't get anything done objectively.
Author's Resource Box
As a person looking for melbourne compensation solicitor you should visit that site. Learn more on the topic of brighton compensation solicitor.
Article Source:
Ezine and Web Articles